i do not create any sense of immortality with
my posts. LOL... you are funny.
secondly, i prefer ambivalence to 'the plight
of others' because its a key element to
understanding.

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><table border="0" width="90%" bgcolor="#333333" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0"><tr><td width="100%"><table border="0" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" bgcolor="#FF9900"><tr><td width="100%" bgcolor=""><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif"> Originally posted by Alex:
Wait, I think I've got it, they know you, and they interceded.</font></td></tr></table></td></tr></table></BLOCKQUOTE>

TG and SF didn't exactly 'intercede'... unless
you want to play a semantics game with me.

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><table border="0" width="90%" bgcolor="#333333" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0"><tr><td width="100%"><table border="0" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" bgcolor="#FF9900"><tr><td width="100%" bgcolor=""><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Alex:
What relevance does my witnessing atrocities have to do with you? What are you implying? That I can't hang a verdict on you because my way in life is no different? That is completely irrelevant</font></td></tr></table></td></tr></table></BLOCKQUOTE>

hypocrisy is never irrelevant except for the
majority of people that perfer to remain hypocritical.

i never visited the damned super8 forum prior
to posting on DT. my comment on the admin. forum
was to awaken you to the idea that people CAN
lurk without posting. just because i post on your
forum does not obligate me to stand in/up for
you. i post when i feel like posting. some issues
seem important for me to show an alternate side.
on the super8 BS, both sides were adequately
represented... with the exception of the admin.
forum... when the opposing side wasn't present,
until i came along.

THINK, alex.

my 'pattern' isn't so difficult to read/understand.

btw... if you want to continue making the 'criminal'
comment an issue, i'll have you know that i
will not go back on it. if your attempt at
continuously bringing it up is to serve me to
feel something skewed from what i felt when i
posted it, you are wasting your time.

if you want to issue some sort of warrant about
my 'erratic' posting behavior about the (lack of)
concern toward my 'fellow man'... then i will
easily show you that it is you in the captains
chair.

you seem to think that all of humanity belongs
to this tightly-knit tapestry of existence,
which is something i disagree with. you seem to
believe that because you have 'associates' with
a foundation of time through your forum, they
should come to your aid in a time of need.
if this were true, you would not be causing so
much discrepencies on HB. you have the tendency
to drown an issue.

i, however, will defend those that i respect,
regardless if they need my help or not.
because you have consistantly given me little
slack, i have no compassion for you.
from the dawn of my posting on DT, you have
seemingly held contempt for me...
since, after all, you claimed that i 'spoke like
the others' which you quickly saddled me
as BEING the others.
after that run around, and the countless emails
attempting to CONVINCE you that i only just
happened upon your forum, you begin on me again.
the next time -- with my emails (which i won't
go into again).
from there it became a game of 'who really is
shatzy'... is she TG, a multiple of people, what?

i have had little repreive from your scorn and judgment.
i have endured your BS every time you bring it.
its rather entertaining to me, yes.

the fact of the matter is, you simply do not
deserve the stand-in.
i have supported your board with my cavalier
posts and even, at a time, added your link to my signature.
i have generated your curiosity and spawned your
(seemingly easy) prompts for appetitive reply.
i have offered countless alternatives to viewing
your blinded, programmed opinions. i have, upon
occasion, applauded your profound postings.
what more do you want?

as far as TG or SF is concerned, they are, in no
way, in comparison to you or me. because they
post here does not aggitate the situation into
some complex issue, though you seem to think it does.

i would gladly stand-in (post) for either one of
them because they have, in different ways, shown
me many areas in which they deserve respect from
me. SF alone has generated my respect in that
she has such a clear-sighted (not to mention
well written -- which necessitates well thought out)
opinion on things. not only that, but she concedes
to alternate opinions and it is clear to me that
when she is sure, she is sure. she can support
her claims. when she isn't sure, she isn't
ashamed to admit it -- nor to be open to alternate
viewpoints... allowing for the understanding of
either. this is not fickle, though by your
standards, it is.

i would gladly stand-in (post) for TG because
he is a clear example of the blinded, programmed
opinion just like you... the only difference
is, he sees that. like SF, he is willing to
listen to a fair share of an alternate opinion
prior to settling (if ever).

what TG and SF have in common, in case it isn't
all that apparent to you, is that they both
know that they don't know (on many topics).
they do not manipulate text/posts based upon
subjectivity...nor continue a thread in the
same manner.
do you not see this as also being detached from
your close-knit tapestry?

i patiently await yet another subjective,
appetitive, low-brow, non-cognitive, jousting
reply from you, alex.